Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Shenzhen Mindray Scientific Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Shenzhen Mindray Scientific Co. Ltd. currently has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 3 actions are spread across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This structure shows a complete lack of overlap in the personnel or the administrative units handling the company's current active patent applications, indicating a highly diversified prosecution landscape.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is KOO, BENJAMIN K, who is currently managing 1 pending office action. Since there are 3 pending office actions in total and 3 distinct examiners, each examiner is responsible for exactly 1 matter. This distribution ensures that no single examiner has a larger influence over the portfolio than the others. The workload is perfectly balanced among the assigned officials.

The use of 3 distinct art units indicates that the 3 pending office actions likely involve different technical sub-specialties within Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. For practitioners, this means navigating three different sets of examiner perspectives and art unit environments. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that the active cases are not concentrated under any single individual.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KOO, BENJAMIN K 1 57.3% +49.7%
TURK, NEIL N 1 51.0% +44.2%
ELLABIB, MAAP AHMED 1 64.0% +37.3%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17128167 ANESTHESIA MACHINE AND SYSTEM ELLABIB, MAAP AHMED 247d overdue
17170779 METHOD FOR DETECTING A BLOOD SAMPLE, BLOOD CELL ANALYZER, AND STORAGE MEDIUM TURK, NEIL N 2d overdue

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17128167 ANESTHESIA MACHINE AND SYSTEM ELLABIB, MAAP AHMED 247d overdue
17170779 METHOD FOR DETECTING A BLOOD SAMPLE, BLOOD CELL ANALYZER, AND STORAGE MEDIUM TURK, NEIL N 2d overdue
17641430 INJECTION PUMP AND INFUSION PUMP KOO, BENJAMIN K —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3783 1
1798 1
3785 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17641430 INJECTION PUMP AND INFUSION PUMP KOO, BENJAMIN K 3783 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 08, 2022
17170779 METHOD FOR DETECTING A BLOOD SAMPLE, BLOOD CELL ANALYZER, AND STORAGE MEDIUM TURK, NEIL N 1798 §101§112 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Feb 08, 2021
17128167 ANESTHESIA MACHINE AND SYSTEM ELLABIB, MAAP AHMED 3785 §102§103 Final Rejection 247d overdue Pending Dec 20, 2020

Managing Shenzhen Mindray Scientific Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Shenzhen Mindray Scientific Co. Ltd. have?

Shenzhen Mindray Scientific Co. Ltd. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Shenzhen Mindray Scientific Co. Ltd. applications?

Benjamin K Koo has the most, with 1 of Shenzhen Mindray Scientific Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Shenzhen Mindray Scientific Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month