Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Shenzhen Qrem Technology Co. Ltd. currently maintains 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This portfolio activity is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a singular point of contact within the patent office. The concentration of the 1 pending action under a single examiner suggests a streamlined but narrow prosecution path for the company's current intellectual property assets.
The busiest examiner identified in the data is GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL, who is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because this examiner is responsible for the entirety of the pending workload, the prosecution strategy for Shenzhen Qrem Technology Co. Ltd. is entirely dependent on the individual examiner's review. This centralization within 1 distinct art unit and under GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL means that the company's immediate patent outcomes in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems are tied to a specific set of examination standards and timelines.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL | 1 | 69.5% | +40.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18578321 | MATTRESS STRUCTURE WITH HIGH FLATNESS | GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL | 23d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3673 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18578321 | MATTRESS STRUCTURE WITH HIGH FLATNESS | GINES, GEORGE SAMUEL | 3673 | §103 | Final Rejection | 23d | Pending | Jan 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial