Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Shibaura Institute Of Technology has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, showing that each of the company's active applications is being reviewed by a different person in a different administrative group. This distribution requires a separate approach for each filing, as there is no overlap in the personnel handling the cases.
BINDA, GREGORY JOHN is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 distinct examiners for the 2 pending office actions, the workload is evenly distributed. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the technology may involve different technical aspects that fall under separate classifications within the mechanical systems sector. Practitioners should manage these 2 pending office actions as independent projects, as the results and examiner feedback from one are unlikely to directly impact the other.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BINDA, GREGORY JOHN | 1 | 80.8% | +11.8% |
| CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S | 1 | 72.7% | +18.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17913259 | CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM POTENTIATING COMPOSITION | CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S | 6d |
| 18879377 | RIVETING METHOD AND FASTENED PRODUCT | BINDA, GREGORY JOHN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17913259 | CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM POTENTIATING COMPOSITION | CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S | 6d |
| 18879377 | RIVETING METHOD AND FASTENED PRODUCT | BINDA, GREGORY JOHN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3679 | 1 |
| 1625 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18879377 | RIVETING METHOD AND FASTENED PRODUCT | BINDA, GREGORY JOHN | 3679 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 27, 2024 |
| 17913259 | CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM POTENTIATING COMPOSITION | CHANDRAKUMAR, NIZAL S | 1625 | §103§112Other | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | Apr 18, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialShibaura Institute Of Technology has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Gregory John Binda has the most, with 1 of Shibaura Institute Of Technology's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
