Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Shionogi Inc.

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 2 of 2 (100%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Shionogi Inc. is active in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, where it currently manages a patent portfolio with 1 pending office action. This single active matter represents the current scope of the company's engagement with the patent office. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the pending application is being evaluated against a specific set of technical and legal standards.

The portfolio's current examination is conducted by 1 distinct examiner, which simplifies the coordination of the prosecution strategy. SAEED, KAMAL A is the busiest examiner for Shionogi Inc., with responsibility for 1 pending office action. As the only examiner assigned to the company's current workload, his specific feedback and examination history will be the primary drivers of the prosecution outcome.

The presence of 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner suggests a very focused intellectual property strategy at this time. Practitioners should focus on the specific nuances of the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector as they relate to the single active case. Because SAEED, KAMAL A is the sole point of contact, understanding his specific preferences is essential for resolving the 1 pending office action efficiently.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
§103 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KANAAN, LIZA TONY 1 23.4% +31.5%
SAEED, KAMAL A 1 83.9% +9.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18500142 METHOD FOR TREATING AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND METHOD FOR SUPPRESSING PROGRESS OF AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS SAEED, KAMAL A 97d overdue

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18839045 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND PROGRAM KANAAN, LIZA TONY 43d overdue

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18839045 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND PROGRAM KANAAN, LIZA TONY 43d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3683 1
1626 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18839045 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND PROGRAM KANAAN, LIZA TONY 3683 §101§102 Final Rejection 43d overdue AI Ready Aug 16, 2024
18500142 METHOD FOR TREATING AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS AND METHOD FOR SUPPRESSING PROGRESS OF AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS SAEED, KAMAL A 1626 §103 Final Rejection 97d overdue AI Ready Nov 02, 2023

Managing Shionogi Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month