Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Sicer S P A has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution involves a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. The company's current patent activity is characterized by this point of contact within the patent office. This concentration of effort suggests a specific technical focus for the company's current intellectual property goals.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is WIESE, NOAH S, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This examiner handles the total volume of pending matters for the company. The outcome of the current prosecution cycle depends on the specific review of this individual examiner within the designated art unit. Practitioners should analyze this examiner's past decisions to better predict the likely path forward for the pending action. With a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit involved, the company can maintain a consistent and focused dialogue with the patent office regarding its chemical innovations.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WIESE, NOAH S | 1 | 83.3% | -1.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18040877 | MIX FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CERAMIC ARTICLES AND RELATED MANUFACTURING PROCESS | WIESE, NOAH S | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1731 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18040877 | MIX FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CERAMIC ARTICLES AND RELATED MANUFACTURING PROCESS | WIESE, NOAH S | 1731 | §103 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Feb 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial