Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days
Sidiz Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution is focused within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical area of interest. CHEN, JOSE V is the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending office action in the entire portfolio, this examiner is the sole individual reviewing the company's active work.
The alignment of 1 pending office action with 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit provides a straightforward prosecution path. Sidiz Inc. can focus its efforts entirely on the examination style and requirements of CHEN, JOSE V within that specific art unit. This focus within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector allows for a streamlined approach to addressing examiner concerns. By concentrating all activity in the 1 distinct art unit, the company minimizes the need to navigate varying procedural standards across different USPTO departments. The presence of only 1 distinct examiner indicates that the portfolio does not currently face diverse examination styles. Practitioners can focus their strategy on the specific tendencies of the busiest examiner to resolve the 1 pending office action efficiently.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHEN, JOSE V | 1 | 78.1% | +15.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19018646 | SEAT CUSHION FOR CHAIR AND SEAT FOR CHAIR INCLUDING THE SAME | CHEN, JOSE V | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3637 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19018646 | SEAT CUSHION FOR CHAIR AND SEAT FOR CHAIR INCLUDING THE SAME | CHEN, JOSE V | 3637 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 13, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSidiz Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Jose V Chen has the most, with 1 of Sidiz Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
