Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Sierra Artificial Neural Networks

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sierra Artificial Neural Networks has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are handled by 3 distinct examiners within 1 distinct art unit, concentrating the technical review in one area while diversifying the personnel involved. This indicates that every pending action is being reviewed by a different individual.

The busiest examiner for the company is MYHR, JUSTIN L, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This accounts for one of the 3 total pending actions currently active. With 3 distinct examiners for the 3 actions, the company must navigate three different individual styles within the same art unit. The 1 pending office action assigned to MYHR, JUSTIN L is the only one for that examiner in this portfolio.

For a practitioner, the concentration of 3 pending office actions within 1 distinct art unit suggests a consistent technical standard will be applied. However, the involvement of 3 distinct examiners means that the specific prosecution style may vary between each of the 3 pending actions. The strategy must account for the individual preferences of each examiner while operating within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
§101 + other1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MYHR, JUSTIN L 1 63.9% +27.9%
HSU, RYAN 1 56.6% +17.4%
MOSSER, ROBERT E 1 46.7% +9.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19068989 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DRIVEN CASINO-STYLE GAME ANALYSIS MYHR, JUSTIN L 142d overdue
18354592 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SLOT MACHINE GAME DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GAME MATH DESIGN SYSTEMS MOSSER, ROBERT E 84d overdue

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19068989 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DRIVEN CASINO-STYLE GAME ANALYSIS MYHR, JUSTIN L 142d overdue
18354596 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SLOT MACHINE GAME DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE QUALITY ASSURANCE GAME DESIGN SYSTEMS HSU, RYAN 77d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3715 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19068989 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DRIVEN CASINO-STYLE GAME ANALYSIS MYHR, JUSTIN L 3715 §101§103 Non-Final OA 142d overdue Pending Mar 03, 2025
18354596 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SLOT MACHINE GAME DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE QUALITY ASSURANCE GAME DESIGN SYSTEMS HSU, RYAN 3715 §112 Final Rejection 77d overdue Pending Jul 18, 2023
18354592 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SLOT MACHINE GAME DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GAME MATH DESIGN SYSTEMS MOSSER, ROBERT E 3715 §101 Final Rejection 84d overdue Pending Jul 18, 2023

Managing Sierra Artificial Neural Networks's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month