Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Signal Engineering Consulting LLC

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Signal Engineering Consulting LLC has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is being handled by a distinct examiner within a distinct art unit, representing a focused prosecution profile. The presence of the art unit suggests that the current legal strategy is concentrated within a specific technical niche of the Chemistry & Materials field.

FISCHER, JUSTIN R is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Because this action constitutes the entirety of the pending workload, the company's immediate patent outcomes depend on this specific examiner. With a distinct examiner and the pending office action, there is no internal baseline for comparison within the current portfolio. Practitioners must focus on the requirements of Fischer and the standards of the art unit to advance this application. Success in this matter will depend on a thorough understanding of the examiner's specific concerns within this technical field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Double-patenting + other1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AHMED, SHEEBA 1 80.7% +14.4%
FISCHER, JUSTIN R 1 44.3% +2.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18989172 LATEX COMPOUNDS WITH ENHANCED WATER BARRIER PROTECTION AHMED, SHEEBA —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18989172 LATEX COMPOUNDS WITH ENHANCED WATER BARRIER PROTECTION AHMED, SHEEBA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1787 1
1749 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18989172 LATEX COMPOUNDS WITH ENHANCED WATER BARRIER PROTECTION AHMED, SHEEBA 1787 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18932769 LATEX COMPOUNDS WITH ENHANCED WATER BARRIER PROTECTION FISCHER, JUSTIN R 1749 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2024

Managing Signal Engineering Consulting LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month