Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Silverwell Technology Limited has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, VARMA, ASHISH K. As the only examiner with a pending case, VARMA, ASHISH K is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. The prosecution is taking place in 1 distinct art unit. This suggests a specific technical focus within the transportation and mechanical systems field. With only 1 pending office action, the portfolio's immediate progress depends on this examination.
The current state of prosecution for Silverwell Technology Limited is highly concentrated. The involvement of just 1 examiner and 1 distinct art unit means that the company's immediate patent strategy is focused on a single point of contact at the USPTO. Practitioners can focus their efforts on the specific requirements of VARMA, ASHISH K and the standards of the art unit involved. This concentration simplifies the management of the pending action and allows for a direct response to the examiner's findings. The outcome of this interaction with VARMA, ASHISH K will be the primary driver of the portfolio's immediate progress.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VARMA, ASHISH K | 1 | 74.5% | +32.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19240143 | HYDRAULIC LOCKING MECHANISM FOR DOWNHOLE VALVE | VARMA, ASHISH K | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19240143 | HYDRAULIC LOCKING MECHANISM FOR DOWNHOLE VALVE | VARMA, ASHISH K | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3674 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19240143 | HYDRAULIC LOCKING MECHANISM FOR DOWNHOLE VALVE | VARMA, ASHISH K | 3674 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 17, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial