Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Simpleway Technologies Ltd. is currently managing a company patent portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area. The portfolio features 1 pending office action, which suggests a targeted approach to its current intellectual property development. This level of activity is typical for companies focusing on a specific software innovation or a single core technology within the computing sector.
The prosecution of this portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly centralized review process where a single examiner in a single art unit is responsible for evaluating the company's claims. This concentration can simplify the prosecution strategy, as there is no need to manage conflicting feedback from different examiners or navigate the varying standards of multiple art units for the 1 pending office action.
JUNG, ANDREW J is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since this examiner is handling the only pending action in the portfolio, their review is the primary factor in the company's current patenting success. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination patterns of this examiner to effectively address the 1 pending office action and move the application toward a final decision.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JUNG, ANDREW J | 1 | 57.8% | +40.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18569933 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOBILE AND STATIONARY COMPUTING DEVICE INTERWORKING | JUNG, ANDREW J | 261d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2175 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18569933 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MOBILE AND STATIONARY COMPUTING DEVICE INTERWORKING | JUNG, ANDREW J | 2175 | §103 | Final Rejection | 261d overdue | Pending | Dec 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial