Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd. currently has 3 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These 3 actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This one-to-one ratio between pending actions and examiners indicates that each matter is being handled by a different individual, requiring the company to manage multiple examiner relationships simultaneously.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is PARK, EDWARD, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because there are 3 distinct examiners for 3 pending actions, no single examiner holds a majority of the workload. This lack of concentration means the company must navigate the specific preferences of 3 different examiners without a single dominant point of contact at the patent office.

The presence of 3 distinct art units further suggests that the company's communications innovations are spread across several different technical classifications. With 3 pending office actions distributed in this manner, practitioners should prepare for varied examination styles. The prosecution strategy must be adaptable to the specific requirements and historical trends of 3 distinct art units to ensure success across the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§102 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
33% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PARK, EDWARD 1 82.3% +17.9%
MYERS, GLENN F 1 77.9% +18.8%
HASSAN, LIBAN M 1 50.8% +31.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18845844 SUBSTRATE DETECTION METHOD AND LOAD PORT PARK, EDWARD —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17619787 CELL CULTURE DEVICE HASSAN, LIBAN M 28d
18845844 SUBSTRATE DETECTION METHOD AND LOAD PORT PARK, EDWARD —
18643387 EFEM MYERS, GLENN F —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2675 1
3652 1
1799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18845844 SUBSTRATE DETECTION METHOD AND LOAD PORT PARK, EDWARD 2675 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2024
18643387 EFEM MYERS, GLENN F 3652 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 23, 2024
17619787 CELL CULTURE DEVICE HASSAN, LIBAN M 1799 §112 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Dec 16, 2021

Managing Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd. have?

Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd. applications?

Edward Park has the most, with 1 of Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Sinfonia Technology Co., Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month