Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sinoway Forest Technology Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is located within 1 distinct art unit, representing a very focused current prosecution effort. The company's active patent office interaction is currently limited to this single technical classification, indicating a narrow scope of pending intellectual property development in this specific field.
The single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, PERRY, MONICA L. As the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, PERRY, MONICA L is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's active patent applications. This means that the company's entire current prosecution success depends on the outcome of its dialogue with this one individual. There are no other pending actions or examiners involved, making this a highly concentrated and singular point of contact for the company's legal representatives at the patent office. This lack of diversity in examiners means the company must focus all its advocacy on this 1 examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PERRY, MONICA L | 1 | 56.1% | +37.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19110436 | TECHNIQUE FOR AFFORESTATION BY AERIAL SEEDING OF PELLETED PLANT SEED UNDER NORMAL PRECIPITATION CONDITIONS | PERRY, MONICA L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3644 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19110436 | TECHNIQUE FOR AFFORESTATION BY AERIAL SEEDING OF PELLETED PLANT SEED UNDER NORMAL PRECIPITATION CONDITIONS | PERRY, MONICA L | 3644 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 11, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSinoway Forest Technology Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Monica L Perry has the most, with 1 of Sinoway Forest Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
