Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sinox Company Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The matters involve 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating separate examination assignments.
LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. No examiner holds the complete pending workload. Counsel should prepare matter-specific responses while tracking any shared technical issues.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T | 1 | 58.3% | +21.4% |
| WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY | 1 | 54.9% | +37.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18740654 | ELECTRONICALLY CONTROL BATTERY BOX LOCK | LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T | — |
| 18631111 | ELECTRONIC CONTROL COMPOUND LOCK | WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18740654 | ELECTRONICALLY CONTROL BATTERY BOX LOCK | LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T | — |
| 18631111 | ELECTRONIC CONTROL COMPOUND LOCK | WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1727 | 1 |
| 3675 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18740654 | ELECTRONICALLY CONTROL BATTERY BOX LOCK | LUSTGRAAF, BENJAMIN T | 1727 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 12, 2024 |
| 18631111 | ELECTRONIC CONTROL COMPOUND LOCK | WATSON, PETER HUCKLEBERRY | 3675 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSinox Company Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Benjamin T Lustgraaf has the most, with 1 of Sinox Company Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
