Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

SK Specialty Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

SK Specialty Co. Ltd. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This portfolio is distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a highly specific examination path where each examiner operates within a separate art unit. Such a distribution suggests that while the technology area is consistent, the specific patent applications may target different technical niches within that broader category. This requires a prosecution strategy that accounts for the unique requirements of two different supervisory groups within the USPTO.

The workload is evenly split among the assigned staff, as the busiest examiner, NGUYEN, CHI Q, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This 1 to 1 ratio between the busiest examiner's load and the total pending actions reflects a lack of examiner concentration. For practitioners, this means that prosecution strategies must be tailored to individual examiner preferences rather than a single primary contact. The presence of 2 distinct art units further confirms that the 2 pending office actions are likely facing different sets of internal guidelines or supervisory styles. Managing these 2 pending office actions involves navigating distinct administrative paths despite their shared technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, CHI Q 1 82.4% +12.4%
PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 1 47.5% +41.3%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18873737 ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING METHOD FOR METAL OXIDE FILM NGUYEN, CHI Q —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18019021 TRISILYLAMINE PREPARATION APPARATUS AND PREPARATION METHOD PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 46d overdue
18873737 ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING METHOD FOR METAL OXIDE FILM NGUYEN, CHI Q —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3635 1
1738 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18873737 ATOMIC LAYER ETCHING METHOD FOR METAL OXIDE FILM NGUYEN, CHI Q 3635 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18019021 TRISILYLAMINE PREPARATION APPARATUS AND PREPARATION METHOD PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 1738 §103 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Jan 31, 2023

Managing SK Specialty Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does SK Specialty Co. Ltd. have?

SK Specialty Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most SK Specialty Co. Ltd. applications?

Chi Q Nguyen has the most, with 1 of SK Specialty Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are SK Specialty Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month