Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Skilljar Inc. currently has 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit, representing a focused prosecution effort. The busiest examiner, LEE, PAUL D, is handling the pending action.
With only the 1 pending office action in the entire portfolio, the company's current patent strategy is concentrated on a single application. This makes the specific examiner's feedback the primary factor in their immediate prosecution timeline, as there are no other pending matters within the art unit to provide alternative paths. Practitioners should focus on the history of the examiner to ensure a successful outcome for this specific filing.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, PAUL D | 1 | 82.9% | +15.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18427700 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FLEXIBLY BENCHMARKING TRAINING PROGRAMS AND EXTRACTING INSIGHTS | LEE, PAUL D | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18427700 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FLEXIBLY BENCHMARKING TRAINING PROGRAMS AND EXTRACTING INSIGHTS | LEE, PAUL D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 4100 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18427700 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FLEXIBLY BENCHMARKING TRAINING PROGRAMS AND EXTRACTING INSIGHTS | LEE, PAUL D | 4100 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial