Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Skyway Technologies Corp. has a streamlined prosecution profile with 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner and a distinct art unit, reflecting a singular point of contact for the company's current patent office interactions. This lack of distribution means the company's immediate prosecution success relies on a single examination path, which simplifies the management of the portfolio's active matters.
The busiest examiner, BESTEMAN-STREET, JACOB KENT, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since the company only has the single pending office action in total, this examiner is currently the sole arbiter for the portfolio's active matters. Practitioners should focus on the specific procedural history of the art unit to anticipate potential outcomes for the pending application. Having only a single distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit involved minimizes the complexity of the current prosecution cycle.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BESTEMAN-STREET, JACOB KENT | 1 | 88.4% | +2.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18900265 | VARIABLE BLOCK RISK ASSESSMENT FOR AUTONOMOUS AIRCRAFT ROUTING | BESTEMAN-STREET, JACOB KENT | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3661 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18900265 | VARIABLE BLOCK RISK ASSESSMENT FOR AUTONOMOUS AIRCRAFT ROUTING | BESTEMAN-STREET, JACOB KENT | 3661 | §101§102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Sep 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial