Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sleep Cycle AB

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Sleep Cycle AB is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This application is assigned to a distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. The narrow scope of current activity suggests a highly specific prosecution phase for the company. The presence of 1 distinct art unit confirms that the pending work is localized within a specific technical division of the patent office. Practitioners should note that this concentration allows for a focused prosecution strategy.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is KRZYSTAN, ALEXANDER J, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because there is only a pending office action and a distinct examiner, the entire prosecution effort is focused on this specific interaction. Practitioners can expect a direct line of communication for the pending office action in the Communications field. This centralized structure allows for a focused approach to resolving the matter currently on file. The lack of multiple pending actions suggests that resources are fully dedicated to this specific case.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KRZYSTAN, ALEXANDER J 1 81.3% +7.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18876103 METHOD FOR SNORE ATTRIBUTION KRZYSTAN, ALEXANDER J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2694 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18876103 METHOD FOR SNORE ATTRIBUTION KRZYSTAN, ALEXANDER J 2694 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2024

Managing Sleep Cycle AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Sleep Cycle AB have?

Sleep Cycle AB has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Sleep Cycle AB applications?

Alexander J Krzystan has the most, with 1 of Sleep Cycle AB's pending office actions.

What technology area are Sleep Cycle AB's patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month