Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Sleipner Motor AS is active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 1 pending office action. The prosecution is highly focused, involving 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current patent office activity is concentrated within a single technical division. For a company working in mechanical systems and transportation technology, this means that the technical merits of their innovation are being evaluated by a specific group of experts within the patent office.
LARS A OLSON is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This action is the only one currently pending for the company. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution path for these mechanical systems filings is currently limited to a single point of review. This provides the applicant with a clear and direct line of communication with the patent office. The practitioner can focus on the specific examination style of this examiner, which can lead to a more efficient resolution of the pending office action compared to portfolios spread across multiple examiners or different technical groups.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLSON, LARS A | 1 | 81.9% | +14.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18294905 | VESSEL STABILIZER | OLSON, LARS A | 21d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18294905 | VESSEL STABILIZER | OLSON, LARS A | 21d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18294905 | VESSEL STABILIZER | OLSON, LARS A | 3615 | §103 | Final Rejection | 21d | Pending | Feb 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial