Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Snapwise Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The company's active prosecution is currently limited to this single matter. This suggests that the company is focusing its current resources on a specific application rather than a broad portfolio of pending cases.
BRUCE M MOSER is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. This single action constitutes the total pending workload for the company. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending action indicates that all current prosecution is under the review of one person. Practitioners should note that the outcome of the company's immediate prosecution in the Computing & Software area depends on the specific review standards of this examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOSER, BRUCE M | 1 | 84.2% | +20.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18411351 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ENHANCE NEWS LITERACY IN NEWS CONSUMERS | MOSER, BRUCE M | 26d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18411351 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ENHANCE NEWS LITERACY IN NEWS CONSUMERS | MOSER, BRUCE M | 26d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2154 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18411351 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO ENHANCE NEWS LITERACY IN NEWS CONSUMERS | MOSER, BRUCE M | 2154 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | 26d | Pending | Jan 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial