Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Socure Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This prosecution is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA, and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner, GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA, is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. The data shows a highly centralized prosecution for Socure Inc., with the total of 1 pending office action being handled by a single examiner.
In the Computing & Software field, this indicates a specific technical focus for the company's current patent application. The involvement of only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit means that the prosecution process is streamlined and focused on a single point of contact. Practitioners should note that the outcome of the pending matter is entirely dependent on the review of GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA, as there are no other examiners or art units currently active in the portfolio. This centralized structure can simplify the management of the patent application but limits the ability to leverage different examiner viewpoints within the same technology area.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA | 1 | 45.0% | +37.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18634350 | Machine Learning System and Method for Watchlist Identity Resolution and Monitoring | GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18634350 | Machine Learning System and Method for Watchlist Identity Resolution and Monitoring | GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2148 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18634350 | Machine Learning System and Method for Watchlist Identity Resolution and Monitoring | GODO, MORIAM MOSUNMOLA | 2148 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial