Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Softwave Tissue Regeneration Technologies Inc. has 1 pending office action currently active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution activity involves 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. Such a focus indicates that the company's immediate patenting efforts are concentrated on a specific technological advancement rather than a broad array of filings. Practitioners can leverage this focus to streamline their communication with the USPTO.
The examiner assigned to this matter is CWERN, JONATHAN, who accounts for 1 busiest examiner pending action. With only 1 pending office action in the entire portfolio, the relationship with this examiner is the primary factor in the company's current prosecution success. Practitioners can focus their resources on the specific requirements of the distinct art unit to address the outstanding issues raised in the pending action. The resolution of the 1 pending action will determine the immediate growth of the portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CWERN, JONATHAN | 1 | 50.9% | +33.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18640046 | ACOUSTIC SHOCK WAVE OR PRESSURE PULSE TREATMENT AND METHODS OF USE FOR TISSUE REGENERATION | CWERN, JONATHAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18640046 | ACOUSTIC SHOCK WAVE OR PRESSURE PULSE TREATMENT AND METHODS OF USE FOR TISSUE REGENERATION | CWERN, JONATHAN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3797 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18640046 | ACOUSTIC SHOCK WAVE OR PRESSURE PULSE TREATMENT AND METHODS OF USE FOR TISSUE REGENERATION | CWERN, JONATHAN | 3797 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial