Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Solivus Limited is navigating 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single matter is being processed by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit, focusing the company's efforts on one specific technical review path. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current innovation is being evaluated against a specific set of prior art and technical standards unique to that division.
DINH, BACH T is the busiest examiner, holding the 1 pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner managing all active prosecution, the company's immediate strategy is centered on the feedback and procedural preferences of this individual official. The 1 pending office action represents the firm's entire active portfolio at the patent office, making the specific examination style of DINH, BACH T the primary factor in determining the timeline for potential allowance.
Practitioners working in the Chemistry & Materials field must be prepared for the rigorous technical scrutiny that comes with 1 pending office action. Since there are no other active matters to balance the workload, the interaction with DINH, BACH T requires careful attention to detail. Success in this 1 distinct art unit will depend on the ability to address the specific technical objections raised by the 1 distinct examiner assigned to the case.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DINH, BACH T | 1 | 55.4% | +31.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18207981 | SOLAR ELECTRICAL GENERATOR | DINH, BACH T | 46d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18207981 | SOLAR ELECTRICAL GENERATOR | DINH, BACH T | 46d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1726 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18207981 | SOLAR ELECTRICAL GENERATOR | DINH, BACH T | 1726 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 46d | Pending | Jun 09, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial