Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Solstara LLC has 1 pending office action currently active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is being handled by 1 distinct examiner within a distinct art unit. The limited scope of pending activity indicates a highly specific prosecution phase for the company. Because the activity is consolidated under these specific office contacts, the outcome of this interaction will define the current success rate for the portfolio in this technology sector. This centralized prosecution requires a precise understanding of the examiner's past decisions and the art unit's general tendencies.
BARR, MARY EVANGELINE is identified as the busiest examiner, holding the 1 pending office action for the portfolio. For a practitioner, this means that the entire immediate future of the company's filings in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector rests on the review of this individual. The presence of the distinct art unit further emphasizes the narrow technical channel through which these claims are being processed. This streamlined profile allows for a very targeted legal strategy, focusing all resources on the requirements of a single examiner and art unit to secure patent rights.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARR, MARY EVANGELINE | 1 | 35.8% | +32.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18893368 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED (AI-BASED) CANCER DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING CANCER IN PRECANCEROUS PHASES | BARR, MARY EVANGELINE | 22d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3682 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18893368 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED (AI-BASED) CANCER DETECTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING CANCER IN PRECANCEROUS PHASES | BARR, MARY EVANGELINE | 3682 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 22d | Pending | Sep 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial