Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Sos Lab Co. Ltd.

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (33%)
2
Easy (67%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Double-patenting only2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
33% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HILGENDORF, DALE W 1 84.4% +21.4%
BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 1 77.7% +16.9%
DICKERSON, CHAD S 1 62.4% +22.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18931719 SHARED VEHICLE SERVICE PROVIDING METHOD PERFORMED BY SERVER COMMUNICATING WITH USER DEVICE OF PASSENGER AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE HILGENDORF, DALE W 46d overdue

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18931719 SHARED VEHICLE SERVICE PROVIDING METHOD PERFORMED BY SERVER COMMUNICATING WITH USER DEVICE OF PASSENGER AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE HILGENDORF, DALE W 46d overdue
18582020 LIDAR DEVICE BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES
18263111 METHOD FOR GENERATING INTENSITY INFORMATION HAVING EXTENDED EXPRESSION RANGE BY REFLECTING GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTIC OF OBJECT, AND LIDAR APPARATUS PERFORMING SAME METHOD DICKERSON, CHAD S

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3662 1
3645 1
2683 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18931719 SHARED VEHICLE SERVICE PROVIDING METHOD PERFORMED BY SERVER COMMUNICATING WITH USER DEVICE OF PASSENGER AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE HILGENDORF, DALE W 3662 DP Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Oct 30, 2024
18582020 LIDAR DEVICE BAGHDASARYAN, HOVHANNES 3645 DP Non-Final OA Pending Feb 20, 2024
18263111 METHOD FOR GENERATING INTENSITY INFORMATION HAVING EXTENDED EXPRESSION RANGE BY REFLECTING GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTIC OF OBJECT, AND LIDAR APPARATUS PERFORMING SAME METHOD DICKERSON, CHAD S 2683 §103 Final Rejection Pending Jul 26, 2023

Managing Sos Lab Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month