Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Soufiane Mohand-Kaci currently has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution activity is managed by 1 distinct examiner, JOSHUA CALEB BLEDSOE. The portfolio's active matters are confined to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a narrow administrative footprint for the current filings. JOSHUA CALEB BLEDSOE is listed as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action.
This single pending office action constitutes the entirety of the current workload for the entity. The use of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit means that all current patent office communication is centralized. Practitioners should observe that the pending office action is the only active requirement at this time. The focus on the Chemistry & Materials technology area is currently being processed through a single channel. This streamlined structure allows for a specific prosecution approach without the complexity of multiple examiner styles. The presence of active matters in 1 distinct art unit indicates a focused effort on a single patent application within the current portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLEDSOE, JOSHUA CALEB | 1 | 44.4% | +52.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17995063 | SHAPEABLE COMPOSITES AND METHODS OF PREPARATION THEREOF | BLEDSOE, JOSHUA CALEB | 131d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1762 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17995063 | SHAPEABLE COMPOSITES AND METHODS OF PREPARATION THEREOF | BLEDSOE, JOSHUA CALEB | 1762 | §103 | Final Rejection | 131d overdue | Pending | Sep 29, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial