Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc. has 3 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are split among 3 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is responsible for exactly 1 pending matter. The portfolio is concentrated in 2 distinct art units, which is fewer than the number of examiners involved. This structure indicates that at least 1 technical group is overseeing multiple applications handled by different examiners.

The busiest examiner, HUANG, CHENG YUAN, is currently managing 1 pending office action. With 3 pending office actions in total, the company is dealing with a small but diverse group of examiners. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the chemistry and materials applications are being reviewed by at least 2 different specialized technical groups. Practitioners should be aware that while the examiner count matches the action count, the overlap in art units may lead to some consistency in the prior art cited against the 3 pending office actions.

Because the 3 distinct examiners are operating within only 2 distinct art units, there is a possibility for shared internal resources or discussions between the examiners. However, the applicant must still address the individual nuances of 3 different officials. The focus on Chemistry & Materials ensures that the prosecution remains within a relatively narrow technical field despite the involvement of multiple examiners. This balance of 3 examiners across 2 units requires a coordinated response strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HUANG, CHENG YUAN 1 39.2% +23.0%
MINSKEY, JACOB T 1 69.2% +33.1%
RASHID, FAZLE A 1 55.5% +48.9%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18852054 COMPOSITE FIBERS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME MINSKEY, JACOB T 83d
18861569 EMULSION BLEND FOR COATING CARBONATES HUANG, CHENG YUAN —
18007826 SURFACE MINERALIZED ORGANIC FIBERS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME RASHID, FAZLE A —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18852054 COMPOSITE FIBERS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME MINSKEY, JACOB T 83d
18861569 EMULSION BLEND FOR COATING CARBONATES HUANG, CHENG YUAN —
18007826 SURFACE MINERALIZED ORGANIC FIBERS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME RASHID, FAZLE A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1748 2
1787 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18861569 EMULSION BLEND FOR COATING CARBONATES HUANG, CHENG YUAN 1787 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 29, 2024
18852054 COMPOSITE FIBERS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME MINSKEY, JACOB T 1748 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 83d Pending Sep 27, 2024
18007826 SURFACE MINERALIZED ORGANIC FIBERS AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME RASHID, FAZLE A 1748 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 02, 2022

Managing Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc. have?

Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc. applications?

Cheng Yuan Huang has the most, with 1 of Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Specialty Minerals (Michigan) Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month