Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Speed Floor Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action located in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ADAMS, GREGORY W, who serves as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit indicates a focused prosecution environment for the company.
The limited scope of 1 pending office action means that individual examiner interactions are the primary factor in current portfolio progress. ADAMS, GREGORY W holds the entirety of the pending workload, making this specific relationship critical for the company's mechanical systems patent strategy. The use of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current filings are concentrated within a single technical specialty.
For practitioners, the focus on 1 distinct examiner allows for a deep dive into the specific examination history of ADAMS, GREGORY W. Since there is only 1 pending office action, the company can dedicate its full attention to resolving the issues raised in this single case. This centralized approach simplifies management but places high importance on the outcome of this individual prosecution.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAMS, GREGORY W | 1 | 75.2% | +23.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18870230 | HORIZONTAL LOADING AND UNLOADING STRUCTURE OF CARGO VEHICLES | ADAMS, GREGORY W | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18870230 | HORIZONTAL LOADING AND UNLOADING STRUCTURE OF CARGO VEHICLES | ADAMS, GREGORY W | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3652 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18870230 | HORIZONTAL LOADING AND UNLOADING STRUCTURE OF CARGO VEHICLES | ADAMS, GREGORY W | 3652 | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial