Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Spider Labs Inc.

Technology area: Networking & Security

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Spider Labs Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, HOLDER, BRADLEY W. HOLDER, BRADLEY W is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending action. The portfolio's current activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a narrow technical scope for the company's pending intellectual property. With 1 pending office action, the immediate prosecution effort is concentrated on this single case.

The involvement of only 1 examiner and 1 distinct art unit means that the prosecution for Spider Labs Inc. is currently very focused. Practitioners can tailor their approach specifically to the requirements of HOLDER, BRADLEY W and the standards of the art unit. This concentration simplifies the management of the pending action and allows for a direct response to the examiner's findings. The outcome of this interaction with HOLDER, BRADLEY W will be the primary driver of the portfolio's immediate progress. The centralized approach ensures that all resources are directed toward resolving the specific concerns of the distinct examiner involved.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOLDER, BRADLEY W 1 83.9% +61.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19140256 FRAUD DETECTION APPARATUS, FRAUD DETECTION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM HOLDER, BRADLEY W —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19140256 FRAUD DETECTION APPARATUS, FRAUD DETECTION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM HOLDER, BRADLEY W —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2408 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19140256 FRAUD DETECTION APPARATUS, FRAUD DETECTION METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM HOLDER, BRADLEY W 2408 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2025

Managing Spider Labs Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month