Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sport Maska Inc.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sport Maska Inc. has 4 pending office actions active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These filings are being handled by 4 distinct examiners, ensuring that each case receives an independent review. The prosecution is conducted across 3 distinct art units, which implies that the company's mechanical innovations are categorized into a few different specialized areas at the USPTO. This distribution across 3 distinct art units and 4 distinct examiners suggests that the 4 pending office actions cover a variety of technical features within the medical device field.

Nini F Legesse is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This figure accounts for one of the 4 pending office actions total. The distribution of 4 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units suggests some level of technical overlap within the USPTO divisions. While each of the 4 pending office actions has a unique examiner, the concentration in 3 distinct art units may provide some consistency in the examination guidelines applied. Practitioners must manage the 4 distinct examiners while addressing the specific requirements of the 3 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
QUINN, RICHALE LEE 1 51.4% +30.3%
LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 1 61.1% +41.6%
STONER, KILEY SHAWN 1 80.8% +15.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18456948 PROTECTIVE SPORTS EQUIPMENT QUINN, RICHALE LEE 38d overdue
18023869 NAMEBAR PRINTER ASSEMBLY FOR SPORTING EQUIPMENT STONER, KILEY SHAWN 22d overdue

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18456948 PROTECTIVE SPORTS EQUIPMENT QUINN, RICHALE LEE 38d overdue
18023869 NAMEBAR PRINTER ASSEMBLY FOR SPORTING EQUIPMENT STONER, KILEY SHAWN 22d overdue
18024824 HELMET WITH LATTICE LINER LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3732 2
1735 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18456948 PROTECTIVE SPORTS EQUIPMENT QUINN, RICHALE LEE 3732 §102§103 Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending Aug 28, 2023
18024824 HELMET WITH LATTICE LINER LYNCH, PATRICK JOHN 3732 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2023
18023869 NAMEBAR PRINTER ASSEMBLY FOR SPORTING EQUIPMENT STONER, KILEY SHAWN 1735 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Feb 28, 2023

Managing Sport Maska Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Sport Maska Inc. have?

Sport Maska Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Sport Maska Inc. applications?

Richale Lee Quinn has the most, with 1 of Sport Maska Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Sport Maska Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month