Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Spray Nozzle Engineering Pty Ltd.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Spray Nozzle Engineering Pty Ltd. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution activity is distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. The presence of these 2 pending actions alongside 2 examiners indicates that each matter is receiving independent review from a different individual. Furthermore, the presence of the 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's technical subject matter is being evaluated across different specialized groups within the patent office.

KIM, CHRISTOPHER S is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This specific examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. Given that the total number of pending office actions is 2, this single examiner is handling 1 of the cases. This concentration of 1 pending office action with KIM, CHRISTOPHER S occurs within a portfolio that is otherwise spread across different technical areas, highlighting a balanced but narrow distribution of pending legal challenges.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BUSHEY, CHARLES S 1 75.5% +22.2%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17627352 AN IMPROVED ASPIRATING SPRAY NOZZLE BUSHEY, CHARLES S 120d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1776 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17627352 AN IMPROVED ASPIRATING SPRAY NOZZLE BUSHEY, CHARLES S 1776 §103 Non-Final OA 120d overdue Pending Jan 14, 2022

Managing Spray Nozzle Engineering Pty Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month