Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Spühl GmbH

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Spühl GmbH has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, which means at least one examiner is handling multiple cases for the company. This distribution provides a mix of unique and repeated examiner interactions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field.

The company's prosecution efforts are divided among 2 distinct art units, showing a focused technical scope. HOTCHKISS, MICHAEL WAYNE is the busiest examiner, holding 2 busiest examiner pending actions. This means MICHAEL WAYNE HOTCHKISS is responsible for a portion of the company's 3 pending office actions, making his examination style a dominant factor.

For patent practitioners, the presence of 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units requires a strategy that accounts for both individual examiner habits and art unit policies. The 2 busiest examiner pending actions assigned to MICHAEL WAYNE HOTCHKISS suggest a concentration of work that could allow for consistent outcomes. Overall, the 3 pending office actions are concentrated enough to allow for detailed attention to each examiner's requirements.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOTCHKISS, MICHAEL WAYNE 2 69.6% +47.8%
STEPHENS, MATTHEW 1 65.1% +21.6%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18689673 COIL SPRING PRODUCT WITH ROTARY CUTTER STEPHENS, MATTHEW 15d
19265117 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING INNERSPRING UNIT HOTCHKISS, MICHAEL WAYNE —
17937014 Innerspring Unit HOTCHKISS, MICHAEL WAYNE —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18689673 COIL SPRING PRODUCT WITH ROTARY CUTTER STEPHENS, MATTHEW 15d
19265117 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING INNERSPRING UNIT HOTCHKISS, MICHAEL WAYNE —
17937014 Innerspring Unit HOTCHKISS, MICHAEL WAYNE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3726 2
3725 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19265117 METHOD OF MANUFACTURING INNERSPRING UNIT HOTCHKISS, MICHAEL WAYNE 3726 §102§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 10, 2025
18689673 COIL SPRING PRODUCT WITH ROTARY CUTTER STEPHENS, MATTHEW 3725 §102§103 Final Rejection 15d Pending Mar 06, 2024
17937014 Innerspring Unit HOTCHKISS, MICHAEL WAYNE 3726 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 30, 2022

Managing Spühl GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Spühl GmbH have?

Spühl GmbH has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Spühl GmbH applications?

Michael Wayne Hotchkiss has the most, with 2 of Spühl GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Spühl GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month