Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sreenivasa Reddy Donapaty currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a highly focused prosecution effort for the active matter. The case is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a specific technical classification for the underlying chemical invention.
HUYNH, BRYANT KHIEM is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This count of 1 accounts for the entirety of the 1 pending office action reported. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the current interaction with the USPTO is centralized under a single official in a single department.
For the applicant, having 1 pending office action in Chemistry & Materials means that the prosecution strategy is currently limited to one front. The 1 to 1 ratio between the action and the examiner simplifies the communication process. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the examiner's specialized knowledge will be the primary factor in the outcome of this 1 busiest examiner pending office action, requiring a targeted legal argument for this specific case.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUYNH, BRYANT KHIEM | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18715043 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MIXING AND CONSUMING ON-DEMAND BEVERAGE COMPRISING LIQUIDS AND INGREDIENTS | HUYNH, BRYANT KHIEM | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3754 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18715043 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MIXING AND CONSUMING ON-DEMAND BEVERAGE COMPRISING LIQUIDS AND INGREDIENTS | HUYNH, BRYANT KHIEM | 3754 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSreenivasa Reddy Donapaty has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Bryant Khiem Huynh has the most, with 1 of Sreenivasa Reddy Donapaty's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.