Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sri LLC currently manages 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific focus for the company's current patent activities. In the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector, this level of concentration often points to a specialized technical filing that falls under a single administrative group.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is TEIXEIRA MOFFAT, JONATHAN CHARLES, who is currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because there is 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's immediate prosecution success is tied to the review of TEIXEIRA MOFFAT, JONATHAN CHARLES. This centralization means that the outcome of the 1 pending office action will be the primary factor in the company's current patent strategy.
The presence of 1 distinct examiner allows the practitioner to develop a focused approach that addresses the specific concerns of TEIXEIRA MOFFAT, JONATHAN CHARLES. Since the 1 pending office action is situated within 1 distinct art unit, the procedural requirements are likely to be consistent and predictable. This streamlined arrangement reduces the administrative burden of managing multiple examiner perspectives for the 1 busiest examiner pending action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEIXEIRA MOFFAT, JONATHAN CHARLES | 1 | 67.0% | +8.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18029974 | POLISHING EQUIPMENT FOR SPHERICAL BODY | TEIXEIRA MOFFAT, JONATHAN CHARLES | 195d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3700 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18029974 | POLISHING EQUIPMENT FOR SPHERICAL BODY | TEIXEIRA MOFFAT, JONATHAN CHARLES | 3700 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 195d overdue | Pending | Apr 03, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial