Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days
Staubli Faverges currently faces 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This activity is confined to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's current patent filings are focused on a specific mechanical or transportation innovation. The presence of 1 distinct art unit ensures that the case is not subject to the varying standards of different examination groups.
The busiest examiner is LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT, who is handling 1 pending office action. As the only distinct examiner involved, this individual's examination style will be the key factor in the prosecution. Practitioners can focus their resources on understanding the specific precedents and preferences of this 1 distinct art unit to optimize the prosecution of the pending matter. This singular focus within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area indicates that the company's current patent efforts are likely directed toward a specific technological niche.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT | 1 | 64.1% | +33.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18981141 | FLUIDIC CONNECTION DEVICE AND FLUIDIC CONNECTION ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SUCH A FLUIDIC CONNECTION DEVICE | LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18981141 | FLUIDIC CONNECTION DEVICE AND FLUIDIC CONNECTION ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SUCH A FLUIDIC CONNECTION DEVICE | LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3679 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18981141 | FLUIDIC CONNECTION DEVICE AND FLUIDIC CONNECTION ASSEMBLY COMPRISING SUCH A FLUIDIC CONNECTION DEVICE | LINFORD, JAMES ALBERT | 3679 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial