Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Stemrim Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Stemrim Inc. has 2 pending office actions in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals. The matters are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, creating separate prosecution paths.

VAN BUREN, LAUREN K is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Counsel can coordinate the portfolio’s biotechnology strategy while preparing examiner-specific responses for each application.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
§112 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VAN BUREN, LAUREN K 1 40.0% +58.4%
BEANE, RANDALL L 1 32.9% +36.2%

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18017149 COMPOSITION FOR USE IN TREATING DYSTROPHIC EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA VAN BUREN, LAUREN K —
17919872 FORMULATION CONTAINING HMGB1 PARTIAL PEPTIDE BEANE, RANDALL L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1638 1
1654 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18017149 COMPOSITION FOR USE IN TREATING DYSTROPHIC EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA VAN BUREN, LAUREN K 1638 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 29, 2023
17919872 FORMULATION CONTAINING HMGB1 PARTIAL PEPTIDE BEANE, RANDALL L 1654 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Oct 19, 2022

Managing Stemrim Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Stemrim Inc. have?

Stemrim Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Stemrim Inc. applications?

Lauren K Van Buren has the most, with 1 of Stemrim Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Stemrim Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month