Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Steven Watts

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Steven Watts maintains a presence in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio currently includes 1 pending office action. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This structure indicates a concentrated prosecution environment for the company's current patent applications.

The busiest examiner identified is WEILER, NICHOLAS JOSEPH. This individual is assigned 1 pending office action. Because the company has 1 pending action, this examiner manages the entire active workload. This means that the prosecution strategy must be specifically tailored to the requirements and preferences of this single examiner.

The fact that there is 1 distinct art unit involved suggests that the technical scope of the pending matter is narrow. Practitioners should prepare for a consistent examination process, as the data shows no other examiners or art units are currently active. This creates a focused but singular point of engagement within the Chemistry & Materials sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WEILER, NICHOLAS JOSEPH 1 62.8% -16.5%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18263704 CONE ROLLING MACHINE WEILER, NICHOLAS JOSEPH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1749 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18263704 CONE ROLLING MACHINE WEILER, NICHOLAS JOSEPH 1749 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2023

Managing Steven Watts's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Steven Watts have?

Steven Watts has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Steven Watts applications?

Nicholas Joseph Weiler has the most, with 1 of Steven Watts's pending office actions.

What technology area are Steven Watts's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month