Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Stichting Ip-Oversight maintains a portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P, who is the busiest examiner for the entity. The presence of 1 distinct examiner indicates a focus for the current prosecution cycle.
The portfolio's activity is limited to 1 distinct art unit, which corresponds with the 1 pending office action. This concentration within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field suggests a specific technical niche. With 1 busiest examiner pending action, the practitioner can focus efforts on the preferences of OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P.
Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, there is no complexity regarding workload distribution. The pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current interaction with the USPTO. Practitioners should prioritize the guidelines of the art unit to resolve the outstanding matter effectively.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P | 1 | 66.4% | +29.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19031354 | A METHOD FOR CREATING COMMODITY ASSETS FROM UNREFINED COMMODITY RESERVES UTILIZING BLOCKCHAIN AND DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TECHNOLOGY | OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19031354 | A METHOD FOR CREATING COMMODITY ASSETS FROM UNREFINED COMMODITY RESERVES UTILIZING BLOCKCHAIN AND DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TECHNOLOGY | OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19031354 | A METHOD FOR CREATING COMMODITY ASSETS FROM UNREFINED COMMODITY RESERVES UTILIZING BLOCKCHAIN AND DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TECHNOLOGY | OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P | 3629 | §101Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial