Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Stiesdal Offshore A/S is currently navigating 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution of these matters involves 2 distinct examiners and a pair of distinct art units. This balanced ratio between actions and examiners suggests a decentralized review process where each application is handled by a different official in a separate administrative group.
Examiner Avila, Stephen P is the busiest individual for this company, managing 1 pending office action. This single action constitutes a portion of the active pending office actions currently on record for the organization. Because the workload is split between different examiners and art units, the company must adapt its strategy to the specific requirements and examination styles of each individual reviewer. This distribution can prevent a single examiner's bottleneck from affecting the entire portfolio of pending matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVILA, STEPHEN P | 1 | 80.2% | +10.5% |
| ANDRISH, SEAN D | 1 | 71.5% | +32.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18954844 | Floating offshore support structure for a wind turbine and a method of its operation using adjustable-ballast reservoirs | AVILA, STEPHEN P | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18865275 | METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING AN OFFSHORE SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR A WIND TURBINE | ANDRISH, SEAN D | 20d |
| 18954844 | Floating offshore support structure for a wind turbine and a method of its operation using adjustable-ballast reservoirs | AVILA, STEPHEN P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| 3678 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18954844 | Floating offshore support structure for a wind turbine and a method of its operation using adjustable-ballast reservoirs | AVILA, STEPHEN P | 3615 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 21, 2024 |
| 18865275 | METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING AN OFFSHORE SUPPORT STRUCTURE FOR A WIND TURBINE | ANDRISH, SEAN D | 3678 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 20d | Pending | Nov 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialStiesdal Offshore A/S has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Stephen P Avila has the most, with 1 of Stiesdal Offshore A/S's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
