Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Storm Shield Of Miami Inc. is managing 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This workload is handled by 1 distinct examiner, TRIGGS, ANDREW J. The portfolio is currently active in a distinct art unit.
The busiest examiner for this company is TRIGGS, ANDREW J, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. This workload constitutes the full extent of the company's current pending matters. Practitioners can focus their analysis on this examiner and art unit to understand the current prosecution landscape. The distinct examiner and art unit define the company's current interaction with the patent office in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. A centralized approach allows for a specific response strategy tailored to the examiner's historical preferences and the art unit's standards.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 1 | 66.7% | +27.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18416241 | RAIN DEFLECTOR APPARATUS AND SYSTEM | TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 30d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18416241 | RAIN DEFLECTOR APPARATUS AND SYSTEM | TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 30d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3635 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18416241 | RAIN DEFLECTOR APPARATUS AND SYSTEM | TRIGGS, ANDREW J | 3635 | §102§112 | Final Rejection | 30d overdue | Pending | Jan 18, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial