Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Stradot Société Par Actions Simplifiée À Associé Unique Et Capital Variable manages a company patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 1 pending office action. This active matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current prosecution efforts are concentrated within a single technical specialty and a single administrative unit at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is KEENAN, JAMES W, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This figure represents the entirety of the company's 1 pending office action workload. The prosecution of this Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems portfolio is therefore focused on the specific requirements and feedback provided by this single examiner, with no other active cases to manage simultaneously.
The 1:1 ratio between the distinct examiner and the pending office action ensures a streamlined communication process for the company. However, the reliance on 1 distinct art unit means the portfolio's immediate progress is subject to the specific examination practices of that unit. With only 1 pending office action, the company's current success in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector depends on the outcome of this single matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEENAN, JAMES W | 1 | 66.8% | +24.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17627766 | CONVEYING DEVICE FOR MOVING VEHICLES, AND ROBOT SYSTEM COMPRISING SUCH A DEVICE | KEENAN, JAMES W | 5d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17627766 | CONVEYING DEVICE FOR MOVING VEHICLES, AND ROBOT SYSTEM COMPRISING SUCH A DEVICE | KEENAN, JAMES W | 5d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3655 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17627766 | CONVEYING DEVICE FOR MOVING VEHICLES, AND ROBOT SYSTEM COMPRISING SUCH A DEVICE | KEENAN, JAMES W | 3655 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | Jul 27, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial