Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Strolleazi Group Limited currently maintains 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, showing a singular focus for the company's active prosecution. The data also identifies 1 distinct art unit associated with this pending matter.
BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J is the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 1 pending office action. This examiner is responsible for the 1 pending office action reported in the portfolio. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector suggests that the current filing is subject to a specific set of technical examination standards.
With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company's current prosecution footprint is highly concentrated. BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J manages the 1 pending office action, providing a clear point of contact for the practitioner. This structure allows for a focused strategy within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area, as there are no other active examiners or art units to coordinate with at this time.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J | 1 | 81.8% | +7.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18817121 | INFANT CAR SEAT SYSTEM | BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J | 18d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3636 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18817121 | INFANT CAR SEAT SYSTEM | BRINDLEY, TIMOTHY J | 3636 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 18d overdue | Pending | Aug 27, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial