Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Stuart Robertson has 1 pending office action currently active in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution is being processed through 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated technical scope for the current filings. The portfolio is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which simplifies the procedural landscape for the applicant. This arrangement suggests that the current patenting activity is focused on a specific technical niche within the chemistry sector.
IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, overseeing 1 pending office action. With the entire current workload focused on 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution strategy is highly centralized. This allows a practitioner to tailor their approach specifically to the expectations of IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE without needing to account for multiple examiner styles. The nature of this prosecution profile makes it easier to maintain consistency in the arguments presented to the USPTO.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | 1 | 33.5% | +24.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17945806 | GARMENT AND A COMPOSITE FABRIC FOR USE IN HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENTS | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1789 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17945806 | GARMENT AND A COMPOSITE FABRIC FOR USE IN HAZARDOUS ENVIRONMENTS | IMANI, ELIZABETH MARY COLE | 1789 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 15, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialStuart Robertson has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Elizabeth Mary Cole Imani has the most, with 1 of Stuart Robertson's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
