Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Stäubli Wft GmbH currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single matter is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus for this application. The 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which means there is a direct and singular point of contact for this prosecution matter.
TRAN, DIEM M is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. As there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending office action in total, TRAN, DIEM M is responsible for the entirety of the current workload. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit suggests that the prosecution is confined to a single specialized group within the patent office. This concentration of 1 pending office action with 1 distinct examiner in 1 art unit simplifies the communication required for this specific portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRAN, DIEM M | 1 | 80.1% | +13.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19222669 | SPEED SENSOR ARRANGEMENT AND FORKLIFT TRUCK COMPRISING SUCH AN ARRANGEMENT | TRAN, DIEM M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19222669 | SPEED SENSOR ARRANGEMENT AND FORKLIFT TRUCK COMPRISING SUCH AN ARRANGEMENT | TRAN, DIEM M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3654 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19222669 | SPEED SENSOR ARRANGEMENT AND FORKLIFT TRUCK COMPRISING SUCH AN ARRANGEMENT | TRAN, DIEM M | 3654 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 29, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialStäubli Wft GmbH has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Diem M Tran has the most, with 1 of Stäubli Wft GmbH's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
