Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Subsea 7 Limited

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Subsea 7 Limited has 4 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The matters involve 4 distinct examiners and 4 distinct art units. DEAL, DAVID R is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The pending work is distributed across all listed examination assignments.

The portfolio requires structured coordination without assuming uniform treatment. Counsel should maintain consistent descriptions of transportation and mechanical concepts while analyzing each office action under its assigned examiner and art unit. The different technical settings may affect prior-art selection, claim construction, and the usefulness of particular amendments. A central review can identify recurring disclosure themes and prevent conflicting positions, but interview preparation and response drafting should remain tied to each matter’s specific objections and prosecution record.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DEAL, DAVID R 1 83.5% +12.1%
GROSS, CARSON 1 73.0% +21.5%
CHIN, PAUL T 1 71.6% +15.7%
LAMBE, PATRICK F 1 62.5% +29.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18774256 Subsea Installations Comprising Corrosion-Resistant Flowlines DEAL, DAVID R —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17781359 Spreader Structures for Lifting Loads CHIN, PAUL T 62d
17636567 Subsea Umbilicals LAMBE, PATRICK F —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18570738 MANUFACTURE OF PIPELINES GROSS, CARSON 42d
17781359 Spreader Structures for Lifting Loads CHIN, PAUL T 62d
18774256 Subsea Installations Comprising Corrosion-Resistant Flowlines DEAL, DAVID R —
17636567 Subsea Umbilicals LAMBE, PATRICK F —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3753 1
1746 1
3654 1
3676 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18774256 Subsea Installations Comprising Corrosion-Resistant Flowlines DEAL, DAVID R 3753 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 16, 2024
18570738 MANUFACTURE OF PIPELINES GROSS, CARSON 1746 §103 Final Rejection 42d Pending Dec 15, 2023
17781359 Spreader Structures for Lifting Loads CHIN, PAUL T 3654 §103§112 Final Rejection 62d Pending May 31, 2022
17636567 Subsea Umbilicals LAMBE, PATRICK F 3676 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 18, 2022

Managing Subsea 7 Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Subsea 7 Limited have?

Subsea 7 Limited has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Subsea 7 Limited applications?

David R Deal has the most, with 1 of Subsea 7 Limited's pending office actions.

What technology area are Subsea 7 Limited's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month