Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

SuccessKPI, Inc.

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (50%)
§103 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
50% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SINGH, GURKANWALJIT 1 61.9% +26.7%
TAN, DAVID H 1 31.3% +17.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18642040 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING REAL-TIME DYNAMIC INTERFACE FOR SUPERVISING INDIVIDUALS SINGH, GURKANWALJIT 39d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17535323 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING PLAYBOOKS TAN, DAVID H 30d overdue
18642040 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING REAL-TIME DYNAMIC INTERFACE FOR SUPERVISING INDIVIDUALS SINGH, GURKANWALJIT 39d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3625 1
2145 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18642040 SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING REAL-TIME DYNAMIC INTERFACE FOR SUPERVISING INDIVIDUALS SINGH, GURKANWALJIT 3625 §101 Final Rejection 39d Pending Apr 22, 2024
17535323 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING PLAYBOOKS TAN, DAVID H 2145 §103 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending Nov 24, 2021

Managing SuccessKPI, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month