Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sudimplant currently manages 1 pending office action. This matter is located within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Having 1 pending office action suggests a focused prosecution phase for the company's current intellectual property interests.
The examination involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit means the technical evaluation is confined to a specific regulatory group. APONTE, MIRAYDA ARLENE is the busiest examiner for this company and is responsible for 1 pending office action, which matches the total count of pending actions for the portfolio.
Because there is 1 distinct examiner, the company's immediate patent outcomes depend on the specific review style of APONTE, MIRAYDA ARLENE. The 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector requires a response tailored to this examiner's history. Managing the prosecution with 1 examiner allows for a direct legal strategy without the need to coordinate across different art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| APONTE, MIRAYDA ARLENE | 1 | 63.2% | +20.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17883845 | DENTAL IMPLANT | APONTE, MIRAYDA ARLENE | 8d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3772 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17883845 | DENTAL IMPLANT | APONTE, MIRAYDA ARLENE | 3772 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | Aug 09, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial