Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Sun Scientific, Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Sun Scientific, Inc. has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. GINA MCCARTHY is the busiest examiner, currently handling 1 pending office action. This distribution indicates that each of the 3 pending office actions is being reviewed by a different individual at the patent office.

The use of 2 distinct art units for 3 pending office actions suggests some technical overlap, though the work is not entirely centralized. With 3 distinct examiners involved, the company's prosecution experience is varied across its active matters. GINA MCCARTHY is the busiest examiner, though she is only responsible for 1 of the 3 pending office actions, reflecting the broad distribution of the workload.

Practitioners should be aware that the 3 pending office actions are spread across 2 distinct art units, requiring attention to the specific standards of each division. Because there are 3 distinct examiners for 3 actions, there is no primary examiner who dominates the current prosecution phase. The busiest examiner, GINA MCCARTHY, manages 1 pending office action, which is consistent with the other examiners in this portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCCARTHY, GINA 1 50.5% +54.9%
PATEL, ROHAN DEEP 1 62.0% +43.0%
FISHER, VICTORIA HICKS 1 40.7% +38.3%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
14714706 Therapeutic Compression Apparatus FISHER, VICTORIA HICKS 61d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17770200 THERAPEUTIC COMPRESSION APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHODS OF USE PATEL, ROHAN DEEP 156d overdue
14714706 Therapeutic Compression Apparatus FISHER, VICTORIA HICKS 61d
18875453 Elevation Apparatus, System and Methods of Use MCCARTHY, GINA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3786 2
3785 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18875453 Elevation Apparatus, System and Methods of Use MCCARTHY, GINA 3786 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
17770200 THERAPEUTIC COMPRESSION APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHODS OF USE PATEL, ROHAN DEEP 3785 §103 Non-Final OA 156d overdue Pending Apr 19, 2022
14714706 Therapeutic Compression Apparatus FISHER, VICTORIA HICKS 3786 §103§112 Non-Final OA 61d Pending May 18, 2015

Managing Sun Scientific, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Sun Scientific, Inc. have?

Sun Scientific, Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Sun Scientific, Inc. applications?

Gina Mccarthy has the most, with 1 of Sun Scientific, Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Sun Scientific, Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month