Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Suneel Navnitdas Parekh has 1 pending office action currently active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner working within 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of the entire pending workload under 1 examiner simplifies the administrative tracking for this portfolio compared to portfolios spread across multiple units. This focused structure allows the applicant to develop a singular response strategy without the need to reconcile conflicting feedback from different units.
The busiest examiner identified is GARNER, LILY CRABTREE, who is handling the 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution path is highly specific. The practitioner can dedicate resources to understanding the specific examination patterns of GARNER, LILY CRABTREE within the context of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. Successfully resolving the matter with the assigned official is the primary objective for this portfolio. The lack of diversity in examiners means the outcome of the current application depends entirely on the interpretation of this 1 individual.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GARNER, LILY CRABTREE | 1 | 68.2% | +16.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17905216 | METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR THE GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY | GARNER, LILY CRABTREE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17905216 | METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR THE GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY | GARNER, LILY CRABTREE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3646 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17905216 | METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR THE GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY | GARNER, LILY CRABTREE | 3646 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 29, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialSuneel Navnitdas Parekh has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Lily Crabtree Garner has the most, with 1 of Suneel Navnitdas Parekh's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
