Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sunfertilize Inc. currently has 1 pending office action. This matter is being handled by a distinct examiner, while the data indicates 0 distinct art units associated with the portfolio. This focus on a specific examiner suggests a very specific prosecution track. The absence of multiple examiners indicates that the company's current patenting efforts are not distributed across different technical reviewers at the USPTO.
TAI, XIUYU is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This action accounts for the 1 total pending office actions for the company. The presence of 0 distinct art units indicates that the portfolio is not currently distributed across different technological classifications at the patent office. Practitioners should focus their resources on addressing the specific concerns of TAI, XIUYU, as this individual holds responsibility for the company's current pending workload. The lack of art unit classification in the data may suggest a unique administrative status for the pending matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAI, XIUYU | 1 | 58.6% | +49.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18199273 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF LIQUID FERTILIZER GENERATION | TAI, XIUYU | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18199273 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF LIQUID FERTILIZER GENERATION | TAI, XIUYU | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18199273 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF LIQUID FERTILIZER GENERATION | TAI, XIUYU | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 18, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial