Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Sunjin Beauty Science Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The company's prosecution is concentrated under 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. LIU, TRACY is the busiest examiner, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. The focus on 1 distinct art unit reflects a specific technical niche within the beauty and pharmaceutical sectors.
With 1 pending office action, the company's immediate patenting efforts are focused on 1 distinct examiner, requiring a targeted approach to resolve the outstanding issues in this biotechnology portfolio. This allows the practitioner to focus on the technical requirements of LIU, TRACY without the need to manage multiple examiners. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's innovations are specialized and do not cross into other scientific fields. This can lead to a streamlined prosecution process if the examiner's concerns are addressed effectively.
The 1 busiest examiner pending action represents the company's entire active prosecution at the USPTO. This makes the outcome of this case critical for the company's intellectual property strategy in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals space. Practitioners must ensure that the response to the 1 pending office action is robust and directly addresses the examiner's objections. The simplicity of the portfolio's structure allows for a focused approach to this pending matter, ensuring that the company's biotechnology innovations receive necessary legal attention.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIU, TRACY | 1 | 54.5% | +27.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17914941 | Elastic Makeup Powder Derived From Natural Inorganic Particulates And Method Of Preparing Same | LIU, TRACY | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1614 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17914941 | Elastic Makeup Powder Derived From Natural Inorganic Particulates And Method Of Preparing Same | LIU, TRACY | 1614 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 2d overdue | Pending | Oct 25, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial